Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 237
Filter
1.
Bull World Health Organ ; 101(6): 371-380A, 2023 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20236229

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine whether the positive results of a single-district pilot project focused on rectal artesunate administration at the community level in Zambia could be replicated on a larger scale. Methods: In partnership with government, in 10 rural districts during 2018-2021 we: (i) trained community health volunteers to administer rectal artesunate to children with suspected severe malaria and refer them to a health facility; (ii) supported communities to establish emergency transport, food banks and emergency savings to reduce referral delays; (iii) ensured adequate drug supplies; (iv) trained health workers to treat severe malaria with injectable artesunate; and (v) monitored severe malaria cases and associated deaths via surveys, health facility data and a community monitoring system. Results: Intervention communities accessed quality-assured rectal artesunate from trained community health volunteers, and follow-on treatment for severe malaria from health workers. Based on formal data from the health management information system, reported deaths from severe malaria reduced significantly from 3.1% (22/699; 95% confidence interval, CI: 2.0-4.2) to 0.5% (2/365; 95% CI: 0.0-1.1) in two demonstration districts, and from 6.2% (14/225; 95% CI: 3.6-8.8) to 0.6% (2/321; 95% CI: 0.0-1.3) in eight scale-up districts. Conclusion: Despite the effects of the coronavirus disease, our results confirmed that pre-referral rectal artesunate administered by community health volunteers can be an effective intervention for severe malaria among young children. Our results strengthen the case for wider expansion of the pre-referral treatment in Zambia and elsewhere when combined with supporting interventions.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Artemisinins , Malaria , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Artesunate/therapeutic use , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Zambia , Artemisinins/therapeutic use , Pilot Projects , Malaria/drug therapy , Community Health Workers
2.
Curr Opin Rheumatol ; 32(5): 449-457, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2319043

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review highlights recent insights into direct antiviral effects by antimalarials against severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2 and other viruses and their potential indirect effects on the host by avoiding exaggerated immune responses (reduced cytokine release, Toll-like receptor response, antigen presentation related to lysosomal processing). RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, there is a large debate on the use of antimalarials for prophylaxis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2-induced disease based on preclinical in-vitro data, small case series and extrapolation from earlier studies of their effect on intracellular pathogens, including many viruses. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or chloroquine have not demonstrated robust efficacy in prior randomized controlled studies against several other viruses. In-vitro data indicate a reduced viral replication of SARS-CoV-2. Especially immunomodulatory effects of antimalarials might also contribute to a clinical efficacy. For SARS-CoV-2 various large studies will provide answers as to whether antimalarials have a place in prophylaxis or treatment of the acute virus infection with SARS-CoV-2 but compelling data are missing so far. SUMMARY: In-vitro data provide a theoretical framework for an efficacy of antimalarials in SARS-CoV-2-induced disease but clinical proof is currently missing.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Animals , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(4): 831-833, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2314119

ABSTRACT

Causes of blackwater fever, a complication of malaria treatment, are not completely clear, and immune mechanisms might be involved. Clinical management is not standardized. We describe an episode of blackwater fever in a nonimmune 12-year-old girl in Italy who was treated with steroids, resulting in a rapid clinical resolution.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Blackwater Fever , Malaria, Falciparum , Malaria , Female , Humans , Child , Blackwater Fever/complications , Blackwater Fever/drug therapy , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Malaria/drug therapy , Italy , Steroids/therapeutic use , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy
4.
BMC Med ; 21(1): 118, 2023 03 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2305572

ABSTRACT

CARAMAL was a large observational study which recorded mortality in children with suspected severe malaria before and after the roll-out of rectal artesunate in Nigeria, Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The results of CARAMAL have had a huge impact on public health policy leading to a World Health Organization moratorium on the roll-out of rectal artesunate. The conclusion reported in the abstract uses strong causal language, stating that "pre-referral RAS [rectal artesunate suppositories] had no beneficial effect on child survival". We argue that this causal interpretation of the study results is not justified. Data from the CARAMAL study inform chiefly on the strengths and weaknesses of referral systems in these three countries and do not inform reliably as to the beneficial effect of providing access to a known life-saving treatment.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Artemisinins , Malaria , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Artesunate/therapeutic use , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Artemisinins/therapeutic use , Malaria/drug therapy , Referral and Consultation
5.
BMC Med ; 21(1): 137, 2023 04 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2303147

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Whole sporozoite immunization under chemoprophylaxis (CPS regime) induces long-lasting sterile homologous protection in the controlled human malaria infection model using Plasmodium falciparum strain NF54. The relative proficiency of liver-stage parasite development may be an important factor determining immunization efficacy. Previous studies show that Plasmodium falciparum strain NF135 produces relatively high numbers of large liver-stage schizonts in vitro. Here, we evaluate this strain for use in CPS immunization regimes. METHODS: In a partially randomized, open-label study conducted at the Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, healthy, malaria-naïve adults were immunized by three rounds of fifteen or five NF135-infected mosquito bites under mefloquine prophylaxis (cohort A) or fifteen NF135-infected mosquito bites and presumptive treatment with artemether/lumefantrine (cohort B). Cohort A participants were exposed to a homologous challenge 19 weeks after immunization. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of CPS immunizations with NF135. RESULTS: Relatively high liver-to-blood inocula were observed during immunization with NF135 in both cohorts. Eighteen of 30 (60%) high-dose participants and 3/10 (30%) low-dose participants experienced grade 3 adverse events 7 to 21 days following their first immunization. All cohort A participants and two participants in cohort B developed breakthrough blood-stage malaria infections during immunizations requiring rescue treatment. The resulting compromised immunizations induced modest sterile protection against homologous challenge in cohort A (5/17; 29%). CONCLUSIONS: These CPS regimes using NF135 were relatively poorly tolerated and frequently required rescue treatment, thereby compromising immunization efficiency and protective efficacy. Consequently, the full potential of NF135 sporozoites for induction of immune protection remains inconclusive. Nonetheless, the high liver-stage burden achieved by this strain highlights it as an interesting potential candidate for novel whole sporozoite immunization approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03813108.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Insect Bites and Stings , Malaria Vaccines , Malaria , Adult , Animals , Humans , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Immunization/methods , Insect Bites and Stings/drug therapy , Malaria/prevention & control , Malaria Vaccines/adverse effects , Plasmodium falciparum , Sporozoites
6.
J Travel Med ; 30(3)2023 05 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2259304

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Delayed treatment is associated with a higher risk of severe malaria. In malaria-endemic areas, the main factors associated with delay in seeking healthcare are low educational level and traditional beliefs. In imported malaria, determinants of delay in seeking healthcare are currently unknown. METHODS: We studied all patients presenting with malaria, from 1 January 2017 to 14 February 2022, in the hospital of Melun, France. Demographic and medical data were recorded for all patients, and socio-professional data were recorded for a subgroup of hospitalized adults. Relative-risks and 95% confidence intervals were determined using univariate analysis by cross-tabulation. RESULTS: There were 234 patients included, all travelling from Africa. Among them, 218 (93%) were infected with P. falciparum, 77 (33%) had severe malaria, 26 (11%) were <18 years old and 81 were included during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. There were 135 hospitalized adults (58% of all patients). The median time to hospital admission (THA) , defined by the period from onset of symptoms to arrival at hospital, was 3 days (IQR = 2-5). A THA ≥3 days tended to be more frequent in travellers visiting friends and relatives (VFR; RR = 1.44, 95% CI = [1.0-2.05], P = 0.06), while it was less frequent in children and teenagers (RR = 0.58, 95% CI = [0.39-0.84], P = 0.01). Gender, African background, unemployment, living alone and absence of referring physician were not associated with delay in seeking healthcare. Consulting during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was neither associated with a longer THA nor with a higher rate of severe malaria. CONCLUSION: In contrast to an endemic area, socio-economic factors did not impact on delay in seeking healthcare in imported malaria. Prevention should focus on VFR subjects, who tend to consult later than other travellers.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , COVID-19 , Malaria, Falciparum , Malaria , Adult , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Malaria/prevention & control , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , Travel , Hospitals , Delivery of Health Care
8.
Acad Emerg Med ; 27(6): 493-504, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2223209

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 has presented clinicians with a difficult therapeutic dilemma. With supportive care as the current mainstay of treatment, the fatality rate of COVID-19 is 6.9%. There are currently several trials assessing the efficacy of different antivirals as treatment. Of these, chloroquine (CQ) and its derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have garnered the most attention. METHODS: In this study, the literature currently available on CQ and HCQ as treatment of COVID-19 was surveyed using EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, MedRxiv, and one clinical trial registry. Upon gathering published and preprint trials, risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. RESULTS: There are currently seven completed clinical trials and 29 registered clinical trials focusing on HCQ or CQ as a therapeutic avenue for COVID-19. Of these, five of seven trials have shown favorable outcomes for patients using CQ or HCQ and two of seven have shown no change compared to control. However, all seven trials carried varying degrees of bias and poor study design. CONCLUSION: There are currently not enough data available to support the routine use of HCQ and CQ as therapies for COVID-19. Pending further results from more extensive studies with more stringent study parameters, clinicians should defer from routine use of HCQ and CQ. There are several clinical trials currently under way with results expected soon.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Pandemics , Research Design , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(7): 1161-1163, 2023 04 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2222606

ABSTRACT

Return to international travel in the COVID-19 pandemic recovery period is expected to increase the number of patients with imported malaria in the United States (US). Malaria prevention in travelers and preparedness for timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment are key to minimize imported malaria morbidity and mortality. Intravenous artesunate (IVAS) is now available from commercial distributors in the US for the treatment of severe malaria. Hospitals and pharmacists should have a plan for malaria treatment, including stocking artemether-lumefantrine for uncomplicated malaria, and stocking or planning for rapid procurement of IVAS for the treatment of severe malaria.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , COVID-19 , Malaria, Falciparum , Malaria , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Pandemics/prevention & control , Artemether/therapeutic use , Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Malaria/diagnosis , Malaria/drug therapy , Malaria/prevention & control , Artesunate/therapeutic use , Travel , Early Diagnosis , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , COVID-19 Testing
11.
Curr Opin Rheumatol ; 32(6): 572-582, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2077899

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is highlighting the most recent evidence on the clinical efficacy and toxicity of antimalarials in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). RECENT FINDINGS: New data confirm the effects of antimalarials in preventing SLE activity, damage and infections and in decreasing mortality. An important reduction in use of health resources is related to continued antimalarial use. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) may prevent preeclampsia in pregnant women with SLE. HCQ ocular toxicity is infrequent and could be associated with blood levels. Gastrointestinal and skin toxicity are underrecognized and could influence adherence. Prolongation of QT interval is extremely unusual with HCQ. Doses of HCQ of 200 mg/day seem to offer a good efficacy/toxicity balance. HCQ protection against herpes zoster and Pneumocystis jirovecii infection has been shown. On the contrary, HCQ prescription by doctors and adherence by patients are both under recommended standards. The recent coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has resulted in a significant shortage of HCQ in many countries with possible consequences in the correct treatment of lupus patients. SUMMARY: Recent evidence reinforces the central role of HCQ in SLE therapy. The reduction in activity, damage accrual and mortality is consistent across studies, countries and ethnical groups. On the contrary, and despite the well established beneficial effects of prolonged regular HCQ therapy, many SLE patients do never take this drug or it is eventually stopped in the setting of severe flares, pregnancy or presumed toxicity. Every effort must be made to assure the correct prescription of HCQ and not to withdraw the drug unless unequivocal signs of toxicity are present.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
14.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 668, 2022 Aug 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1968551

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uganda accounts for 5% of all malaria cases and deaths reported globally and, in endemic countries, pregnancy is a risk factor for both acquisition of P. falciparum infection and development of severe malaria. In recent years, malaria control has been threatened by COVID-19 pandemic and by the emergence, in Northern Uganda, of both resistance to artemisinin derivatives and to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. METHODS: In this facility-based, prospective, observational study, pregnant women will be recruited at antenatal-care visits and followed-up until delivery. Collected data will explore the incidence of asymptomatic parasitemia and malaria-related outcomes, as well as the attitudes towards malaria prevention, administration of intermittent preventive treatment, healthcare seeking behavior and use of insecticide-treated nets. A subpopulation of women diagnosed with malaria will be recruited and their blood samples will be analyzed for detection of genetic markers of resistance to artemisinin derivatives and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. Also, to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on malaria care among pregnant women, a retrospective, interrupted-time series will be conducted on at the study sites for the period January 2018 to December 2021. DISCUSSION: The present study will explore the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on incidence of malaria and malaria-related adverse outcomes, along with the prevalence of resistance to artemisinin derivatives and to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. To our knowledge, this is the first study aiming to explore the combined effect of these factors on a cohort of pregnant women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov public website on 26th April, 2022. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT05348746.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Artemisinins , COVID-19 , Malaria, Falciparum , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Artemisinins/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Drug Resistance , Female , Humans , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , Malaria, Falciparum/epidemiology , Malaria, Falciparum/prevention & control , Observational Studies as Topic , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Prospective Studies , Pyrimethamine/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Sulfadoxine/therapeutic use , Uganda/epidemiology
15.
Trop Med Int Health ; 27(3): 330-336, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1968203

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess readiness among primary public health facilities in Kenya to provide pre-referral antimalarials for severe malaria. METHODS: Nine national surveys of randomly selected primary public health facilities undertaken bi-annually between 2017 and 2021 were analysed. The outcomes included the availability of pre-referral antimalarial drugs at the health facilities and health worker knowledge of recommended pre-referral treatment for severe malaria. RESULTS: A total of 1540 health workers from 1355 health facilities were interviewed. Injectable artesunate was available at 46%, injectable quinine at 7%, and artemether at 3% of the health facilities. None of the facilities had rectal artesunate suppositories in stock. A total of 960 (62%) health workers were trained on the use of injectable artesunate. 73% of the health workers who had ever referred a child with severe malaria were aware that artesunate was the recommended treatment, 49% said that intramuscular injection was the preferred route of administration, and 60% stated the correct dose. The overall knowledge level of the treatment policy was low at 21% and only slightly higher among trained than untrained health workers (24% vs 14%; p < 0.001) and those with access to guidelines versus those without access (29% vs 17%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The readiness of primary health facilities and health workers to deliver appropriate pre-referral care to children with complicated malaria in Kenya is inadequate. Further investments are required to ensure (a) availability of nationally recommended pre-referral antimalarials; (b) appropriate training and supervision in their administration, and (c) monitoring of the entire referral process.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Malaria , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Artesunate/therapeutic use , Child , Humans , Kenya , Malaria/drug therapy , Public Health , Referral and Consultation
17.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 22(6): e171-e175, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1926993

ABSTRACT

The countries of the Greater Mekong subregion-Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam-have set a target of eliminating all Plasmodium falciparum malaria by 2025. Generous funding has been provided, principally by The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, to achieve this objective and thereby prevent the spread of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum to India and Africa. As the remaining time to reach agreed targets is limited and future external funding is uncertain, it is important to be realistic about the future and spend what remaining funding is left, wisely. New, labour intensive, vertical approaches to malaria elimination (such as the 1-3-7 approach) should not be promoted as these are unproven, likely to be ineffective, costly, and unlikely to be sustainable in the most remote areas where malaria prevalence is highest. Instead, the focus should be on reducing the malaria burden more rapidly in the remaining localised high transmission foci with proven effective interventions, including mass drug administration. Well supported community-based health workers are the key operatives in controlling malaria, but their remit should be broadened to sustain the uptake of their services as malaria declines. This strategy is a sustainable evolution, which will improve rural health care while ensuring progress towards malaria elimination.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Malaria, Falciparum , Malaria , Antimalarials/pharmacology , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Humans , Malaria/drug therapy , Malaria/epidemiology , Malaria/prevention & control , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , Malaria, Falciparum/epidemiology , Malaria, Falciparum/prevention & control , Mass Drug Administration , Plasmodium falciparum
18.
Phytomedicine ; 104: 154259, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1914900

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Artesunate, as a semi-synthetic artemisinin derivative of sesquiterpene lactone, is widely used in clinical antimalarial treatment due to its endoperoxide group. Recent studies have found that artesunate may have multiple pharmacological effects, indicating its significant therapeutic potential in multiple respiratory diseases. PURPOSE: This review aims to summarize proven and potential therapeutic effects of artesunate in common respiratory disorders. STUDY DESIGN: This review summarizes the pharmacological properties of artesunate and then interprets the function of artesunate in various respiratory diseases in detail, such as bronchial asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung injury, lung cancer, pulmonary fibrosis, coronavirus disease 2019, etc., on different target cells and receptors according to completed and ongoing in silico, in vitro, and in vivo studies (including clinical trials). METHODS: Literature was searched in electronic databases, including Pubmed, Web of Science and CNKI with the primary keywords of 'artesunate', 'pharmacology', 'pharmacokinetics', 'respiratory disorders', 'lung', 'pulmonary', and secondary search terms of 'Artemisia annua L.', 'artemisinin', 'asthma', 'chronic obstructive lung disease', 'lung injury', 'lung cancer', 'pulmonary fibrosis', 'COVID-19' and 'virus' in English and Chinese. All experiments were included. Reviews and irrelevant studies to the therapeutic effects of artesunate on respiratory diseases were excluded. Information was sort out according to study design, subject, intervention, and outcome. RESULTS: Artesunate is promising to treat multiple common respiratory disorders via various mechanisms, such as anti-inflammation, anti-oxidative stress, anti-hyperresponsiveness, anti-proliferation, airway remodeling reverse, induction of cell death, cell cycle arrest, etc. CONCLUSION: Artesunate has great potential to treat various respiratory diseases.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Asthma , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Lung Injury , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Antimalarials/pharmacology , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Artesunate/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/metabolism , Fibrosis , Humans , Lung Injury/drug therapy , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy
19.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0261980, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1910484

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Health care workers are at high risk of being infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for prophylaxis of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) in health personnel exposed to patients infected by SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled single center clinical trial. Included subjects were health care workers caring for severe COVID-19 patients. Main outcome was time to symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: 127 subjects with a confirmed baseline negative RT-PCR SARS-CoV2 test were included in the trial. 62 assigned to HCQ and 65 to placebo. One subject (1.6%) in the HCQ group and 6 (9.2%) subjects in the placebo group developed COVID-19 (Log-Rank test p = 0.07). No severe COVID-19 cases were observed. The study was suspended because of a refusal to participate and losses to follow up after several trials reported lack of effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The effect size of hydroxychloroquine was higher than placebo for COVID-19 symptomatic infection in health personnel, although this was not statistically significant. The trial is underpowered due to the failure to complete the estimated sample size.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/prevention & control , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Adult , COVID-19/diagnosis , Double-Blind Method , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Male , Placebo Effect , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Treatment Outcome
20.
Molecules ; 27(12)2022 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1911482

ABSTRACT

As the world desperately searches for ways to treat the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a growing number of people are turning to herbal remedies. The Artemisia species, such as A. annua and A. afra, in particular, exhibit positive effects against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and COVID-19 related symptoms. A. annua is a source of artemisinin, which is active against malaria, and also exhibits potential for other diseases. This has increased interest in artemisinin's potential for drug repurposing. Artemisinin-based combination therapies, so-called ACTs, have already been recognized as first-line treatments against malaria. Artemisia extract, as well as ACTs, have demonstrated inhibition of SARS-CoV-2. Artemisinin and its derivatives have also shown anti-inflammatory effects, including inhibition of interleukin-6 (IL-6) that plays a key role in the development of severe COVID-19. There is now sufficient evidence in the literature to suggest the effectiveness of Artemisia, its constituents and/or artemisinin derivatives, to fight against the SARS-CoV-2 infection by inhibiting its invasion, and replication, as well as reducing oxidative stress and inflammation, and mitigating lung damage.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Artemisia annua , Artemisia , Artemisinins , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Malaria , Antimalarials/pharmacology , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Artemisinins/pharmacology , Artemisinins/therapeutic use , Humans , Malaria/drug therapy , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL